Translator Carla Palomino, OLPC president Walter Bender, Peru technical lead Hernàn Pachas, and Brightstar OLPC lead Edgar Ceballos try to convince me their map isn’t funny.
(This article in German: → Auf Deutsch lesen. Danke, Niklaus Giger!)
I recently returned from a grueling three-week stay in Peru, where I worked with the serious Ministry of Education team entrusted with the country’s 260-thousand laptop OLPC implementation.
We chewed through every aspect of deployment planning, both technical and organizational, from the moment the laptop shipment will arrive in Lima until the laptops reach the hands of 40 thousand children at the first 569 schools to participate in the program.
After I shone the Bat Signal, the inimitable Walter Bender flew in and quickly took over the organizational and educational discussions, allowing me to sink my teeth into resolving the outstanding technical deployment issues. Note to self: it’s nice to work with hypercompetent people.
In between writing a custom warehouse inventory system for the country’s use (don’t ask) and discussing their delivery security needs, I took a day off to visit Arahuay, a homey hilltop hamlet with two claims to fame: hosting OLPC’s 8-month Peru pilot, and almost becoming the site of my untimely demise at the hands of a treacherously-situated satellite terminal.
OLPC’s tireless Carla Gomez-Monroy wrote up the Arahuay pilot at length when it began last June, and a widely-published followup report from the Associated Press in December opened with powerful words:
Doubts about whether poor, rural children really can benefit from quirky little computers evaporate as quickly as the morning dew in this hilltop Andean village, where 50 primary school children got machines from the One Laptop Per Child project six months ago.
School being out for summer vacation and perilous mountain roads be damned, I thought, it must be worthwhile to see the school first-hand and speak with the teachers.

We drove for about four hours, seeing the landscape oscillate between a barren wasteland and lush green mountainsides.

I wasn’t wrong about it being worthwhile.
The background
Last year, 48 children attended primary school in Arahuay. Carla’s report lists 46 — this is because 2 more enrolled after the OLPC pilot was announced, bringing attendance to 100% of the town’s children. Another 50 children of the town’s 800 inhabitants attend high school, and roughly a hundred kids are in kindergarten.
The Arahuay school has 16 teachers. Three teach primary school, two grades each, and of the thirteen high school teachers, nine teach different classes with four acting as substitutes where necessary. Ten high school classes are taught, all in all: mathematics (up to an introduction to functions and geometry), communication, social studies (essentially history), person and family (standards of behavior in and out of the home, children’s rights and responsibilities to the family), arts, physical education, foreign language, organized learning (for instance, how to do homework efficiently), work education (e.g. how to make shoes, how to make leather) and natural sciences (spanning biology, chemistry, ecology and physics at very basic levels). To become a teacher in Peru, one must either complete an exam or write a thesis, with both requiring the completion of a 5-year program at a university or institute.
The former principal of the Arahuay school, Guillermo Lazo Navarro, and the current principal, Patricia Peña Cornejo, both graciously took time out of their day to meet with me.
I wanted to know what the laptops had done for the kids. I told them I’m not a reporter, I don’t answer to the Ministry, and — an important disclaimer for an overpoliticized country like Peru — I don’t pander to bullshit politics. I wanted to hear if they thought the laptops were helping.
(Photo: the town of Arahuay.)
After looking at me blankly for a good half-minute, Mr. Navarro shot back with “evidentemente”, “obviously”, and palpably left off “you idiot” from the end of the sentence. I appreciated the small courtesy and asked a more specific question: what changed in the 8 months since the laptops arrived?
Three changes
Mr. Navarro and Mrs. Cornejo spoke amongst themselves for a few minutes. Then Mr. Navarro said they agreed there were three key changes.
As there are few roads in and around Arahuay, the children don’t communicate much outside of school — with anyone. The teachers started independently pointing out to Mr. Navarro that this was changing once the laptops arrived: kids started talking to each other outside of school hours over the mesh, and working together more while in school. They started talking a lot more with each other in person, and conquered their previously paralyzing fear of strangers.
The second thing, Mrs. Cornejo jumped in, is that the kids used to be pretty selfish, an unsurprising consequence of the abject poverty in much of Peru. It’s not that the kids are starving, it’s just that they don’t have very much; what they do have, they’re reluctant to share. With the laptops, the kids had to turn to each other to learn how to use them. Then they realized it was easy to send each other pictures and things they’ve written — and it became commonplace. The sharing, asserts Mrs. Cornejo, extended into the physical world, where once jealously-guarded personal items increasingly started being passed around between the kids, if somewhat nervously.
(Photo: the Arahuay school, exterior.)
“Finally,” opened Mr. Navarro, and hesitated. He gave me another long look, clearly unsure if to proceed. I put on my best smile, and assured him it’s exactly the things he would hesitate to tell me that I want to hear most. He cleared his throat, and in a conspiratorial, low voice — despite the fact we were in an empty room in the town hall — explained he was sure, in the beginning, the pilot would fail.
“Children’s fathers used to seethe with fury when the laptops were passed out, because the kids no longer wanted to help work in the field all day,” he continued.
Mr. Navarro speaks in slow, measured sentences. He is thoughtful and confident, both reminders — along with his weathered face — of being, for many years, foremost a teacher.
“I didn’t know how we’d stop the fathers from revolting and making the kids return their XOs,” he says, shaking his head slightly. “The kids solved the dilemma for me: they taught their fathers how to use the Internet and a search engine.”
“Then they started showing them the work they were doing for school. The reports they wrote, the pictures they took, the notes they compiled. And the fathers had actual proof that their kids were learning,” he concluded.
(Photo: the Arahuay school, classroom interior. Patch panel and coax VSAT hookup visible in the back, disconnected for summer vacation.)
The fathers, I later heard, all decided an education could stop their children from having no choice but to work the field all day as they did. With the laptops in place, the school was no longer a black box whose efficacy had to be taken on faith: the kids could prove they were learning. Schooling had gone open source. So their parents started having them help out only when necessary, and left them to read and write on their XO the rest of the time.
I asked Mrs. Cornejo about the school curriculum. Where was it coming from? Was it any good?
“At the beginning of the year, our teachers used only materials provided by the Ministry. With the laptops, they started doing their own research on the web, preparing detailed lesson plans, and even enlisting the kids’ help. We’ve never seen anything like it,” she cooed. I pressed for details.
“We teach a lesson on the digestive tract, but it’s all spoken, with no visual aids. Well, the teachers had kids look up pictures of the gastrointestinal system, and then they all worked together on putting them into a file from which the lesson ended up being taught,” she offers.
The bad sides
Everything I had heard so far was overwhelmingly enthusiastic and positive. I wanted to hear what wasn’t working. What’s bad about the laptops? The idea?

“The kids really want an activity to learn English, but there isn’t one on the laptops” responds Mr. Navarro. “The 1st and 2nd graders all use an online dictionary, but the Internet connection gets slow with that many users. It’d be nice if a dictionary was on the XO directly. And some mind mapping software,” chimes in a younger teacher who used mind maps heavily in her own schooling.
Both Mrs. Cornejo and Mr. Navarro thought the XO would exacerbate some existing discipline problems at the school. One student, whose name I’ll withhold, commonly gets in fights with others, didn’t speak to or play with his classmates, and would normally sit in a corner of the classroom by himself. The principals anticipated the XO would make him even more territorial and isolated, but they were taken by complete surprise when he became the first kid to figure out the laptop, and then started teaching the others who curiously flocked around him.
“We don’t tell these feel-good stories, these fairy tales,” Mr. Navarro responded to my unspoken skepticism. “It’s just what happened. It’s just how it is.”
I headed back to Lima several hours later, astounded by what I heard and saw.
I don’t write these feel-good stories, these fairy tales. It’s just how it is.
(Photo: sunset at the Lima coastline.)


Berislav Lopac said,
March 7, 2008 @ 4:59 am
Wonderful. You’re really doing a heroic work out there.
Marta Voelcker said,
March 7, 2008 @ 11:38 am
Great report! Thanks for sharing! I have heard from Walter Bender that the Peru pilot is the most impressive, they are really faraway from everything, but I didn’t know much more. Could you tell me which softwares are they using? Have they explored squeak E-toys or similar, so far?
Scott J Roberts said,
March 7, 2008 @ 12:27 pm
Looks absolutely amazing and it’s great to hear such positive and concrete and positive results.
Daniel Drake said,
March 7, 2008 @ 1:12 pm
Thanks for sharing this - very well written!
homunq said,
March 7, 2008 @ 1:13 pm
Wow. Great.
Just a note on language - in Spanish, the word “padres” (literally, fathers) is also the word used for parents in general (in education, this is especially true in the form “padres de familia” which refers to the group of parents for a school). It is possible that in the discussion sometimes they meant “fathers” as your translation indicates, but in general “parents” would be a safer translation.
C. Scott Ananian said,
March 7, 2008 @ 4:10 pm
Man, I need to get out more. I’m stuck in Cambridge herding cats.
Will Godfrey said,
March 8, 2008 @ 4:33 am
I was afraid such a worthwhile project would be killed by big business greed. Your report gives me great hope that this will not happen.
I wish I could be there to see this.
Ann Boes said,
March 8, 2008 @ 8:12 am
Thank you for taking the time to write in such detail and for providing links to previously written accounts. It is heartening to hear.
Nicole Thibault said,
March 8, 2008 @ 3:02 pm
You are funny… the work that you are doing and how you write about it is very inspirational… as a primary school teacher I have often been pre-occupied with how computers are not seen simply as tools but given the status of gods in schools… usually at the expense of the gift of time to relate with others towards deeper learning and creating with materials other than plastic… your illustration of the event of XO in Peru shows technology as a tool for learning and relating quite beautifully… I look forward to following your OLPC journey and perhaps seeing you speak in Vancouver, B.C. this coming June…
Thank you for believing in the natural learning process of children and creating meaningful opportunities for their infinite potential… the world is watching…
Dan Perez said,
March 9, 2008 @ 10:18 am
Nice work. Write-ups like this are the simply amazing to read. I’m a big fan of the OLPC mission, and a G1G1 owner, and even I sometimes question whether a laptop will do as much good as I hope. Reading this type of write-up is exactly what I needed to get inspired again. Thanks for all the hard work.
Niklaus Giger said,
March 9, 2008 @ 11:15 am
I liked the article a lot as it responds very well about often asked questions whether the OLPC is really helpful for poor children. And the obstacles to overcome to convince the parents about the utility of education reminds me of many similar tales I heard from older people here in the mountains.
Bob Thomson said,
March 9, 2008 @ 3:13 pm
I lived in Pomabamba, Ancash in 1968-70. It was a feudal society before the 1969 military land reform. (And probably for some time after no doubt.) I remember a small village near us got it’s first copper telegraph line in 1969. There were 46 logons to a progressive Amsterdam based web site from that village between October and December 2007! The world has truly changed.
Bob Thomson
Paris, France
Michael McNeil said,
March 10, 2008 @ 4:42 am
I remember reading about a Scot who went out to work on a trading post in the Arctic. His biggest fear was the alienation of the children of the locals who went away to school.
This is something that tended to interfere with the way rural tribal behaviour changed with all trade and prosylitising in the 18th and 19th centuries. I fear this is just a sophistication of such alienation of children from cultures that are centuries old.
It would be nice to think that it allows the locals to engage in fair trade. And that any other issues will resolve themselves in a beneficial way for all. But we know that the world dosn’t work like that.
Peter Weiss said,
March 10, 2008 @ 12:33 pm
Thanks for this wonderful report. Just like the parents having to go on faith that their children’s schooling is having a good effect, we who support the distribution of these laptops go on faith that they are working. It is great to hear from the teachers about this.
Heather Gray said,
March 10, 2008 @ 4:39 pm
Thank you, for a real world account, after all the hype.
Gabriel Michhue said,
March 11, 2008 @ 1:54 pm
Thanks for sharing this experience. I was very disappointed when I noticed that the most important critic of OLPC came from Peru (I am peruvian ). Things like laptops are not the solution, laptops without good teachers are useless…
I think your report is going to evaporate those critics.
Ithaca, NY
Jose Lorenzo said,
March 12, 2008 @ 6:50 am
Great story. Don’t particularly want to change mood so abruptly, but I want to bring a particular conversation to your attention.
It’s “The XO for adults” thread at LinuxToday. The summary of the 3rd post in that subdiscussion goes something like this: Providing a built-in alternate interface to the XO (based on Linux) may very well help grow sales, which would mean more kids get XO’s and at a lower cost. Additionally, you would be making a further investment in the kids post-kid life as well as in these kids’ kids by making it a bit easier for adults to also benefit from the XO.
Yes, I know there are issues and a desire to keep the XO only for kids, but, if in the interest of growing sales or of keeping up with competitors that are selling Windows, the choice comes down to a dual booting closed source controlled Windows or a second nice open Linux (eg, Linpus), I can’t imagine there being much of an argument.
Once again, great job. I bought a few XO’s and do genuinely want this effort to succeed as much as possible.
Christoph Derndorfer said,
March 12, 2008 @ 11:58 am
Excellent write-up, definitely amongst the best reports from the ground when it comes to an actual OLPC deployment!
I wanted to head back to Peru this summer (I lived and went to school in Trujillo, about 8h north of Lima, from 2000 to 2001) but unfortunately I won’t be able to make it. Well, maybe early next year… :-)
Thomas Wanhoff said,
March 12, 2008 @ 11:44 pm
Amazing story, got this from a friend and will spread it hear in Cambodia!
Thx for sharing your experience and for your work there!
Andrey Gerasimenko said,
March 13, 2008 @ 12:00 pm
Thanks for the excellent report from the field. I have read the Carla Gomez-Monroy’s report as well. As far as I understand, the OLPC project is an attempt to provide cheap laptops earlier than it would happen naturally, due to market forces, using the scale economy and the purchasing power enjoyed by governments, even those of poor countries.
The success of the plan will be beneficial to everyone, so, if the result of the test deployment is considered positive, it is very very good.
The problem, as I see it, is that no limited scale deployment can tell if spending about $150 per child on XOs is the best possible investment. The Arahuay case proves obvious things: free Internet is good, wealth improves manners, kids may be more eager to go to school to play than to study.
Using a laptop and Internet to write home work has obvious drawbacks, starting with the shallow nature of Internet “knowledge” and downloading of someone else’s work. Learning while playing may be welcomed by both kids and teachers, but if I have a serious medical problem, I will be happy to know that my doctor studied in a more traditional way.
The only reported change to the educational process is “teachers doing research on the web”. Would a $400 desktop be a better tool for that?
I hope that the OLPC project will bring a $200 laptop to me (in fact, I think Asus EeePC should cost $200 right now). I also hope that when Peru deploys thousands of XOs, the things will change. Teachers will know that any student may be as smart as a Google search and start “doing research”. When all students are equipped with a computer, the learning process may be optimized and a healthy ecosystem of school servers, scanners, and printers created. Elder students will get better free laptops. Computers will be used to teach things only they can teach, like formal analysis and computers, not “physics at very basic level” .
If that happens, I will say XOs are the best possible investment. Once again, no small deployment can tell if that will or will not happen.
BTW, is there any example of a good US school that requires that all students own laptops and benefits from that?
Dhashen Naicker said,
March 13, 2008 @ 5:43 pm
About the dictionary on the laptop - I’ve followed http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=145949&highlight=offline+dictionary to have the dictionary run local. You can install thesaurus and various languages. Works for our educational setup. Its great to hear about the success of this program. Thank you for sharing.
Edgar A. Ceballos said,
March 17, 2008 @ 11:04 am
Ivan,
Great article.
I am very proud to be part of this project.
Edgar A. Ceballos
Director, Program Implementations OLPC
Brightstar Corporation
Miami, FL
USA
Mary Lue Peck said,
March 18, 2008 @ 11:46 am
This article is a much-needed reminder of the goals and successful accomplishments of programs such as OLPC. So many of us take our lifestyles for granted – especially Internet access, “basic” computers, easy access to places and information and, as students, the luxury of focusing only on school (not on work).
The education and understanding of technology this program provides is outstanding. It’s also amazing to hear about all of the other benefits this program encourages, such as enabling parents to envision a better future for their children, encouraging teamwork, and allowing a “troubled” youth to find the confidence and a path to not only express himself, but to help others. It’s also wonderful that the children want even more knowledge (e.g., they want to learn English) and that they are teaching their parents about technology. Again, we take so much for granted and this article serves as a reminder and as inspiration.
Thank you for taking the time to go to Peru and write this article!
George Correa said,
March 22, 2008 @ 9:20 pm
There is Hope!
A small contribution for forgotten kids that will be marked in some positive way by this philanthropic effort!
“There is no Energy Shortage. There is no Energy Crisis. There is a Crisis of Ignorance”.
-R. Buckminster Fuller
Andrew McMillan said,
March 23, 2008 @ 4:37 am
The anecdote about the child who was previously disruptive is very interesting, particularly the fact that he was the first to figure it out. That sort of behaviour is not all that unusual among very bright children who are bored with the regimented as-fast-as-the-slowest pace of factory-style schooling.
Thank goodness the OLPC arrived to provide an outlet for that boy to learn at his own pace, and to gain respect from the others.
Luis Fernando Sánchez said,
March 23, 2008 @ 9:21 pm
I am really impressed, this is a great experience that I want to develop in our school in Colombia one day. Thanks for helping to educate children of the world.
Cherie Johansson said,
June 13, 2008 @ 6:01 am
These results are consistent with the results I had as a teacher in the late 1980s - early 1990s using IT in the early stages in the classroom. A particularly fabulous project was engaging the community - as this example indicates - the buy-in and endorsement by parents further cements the excellent work of the young people and the leaders making this happen….well done and how can I help?
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a Comment